What was the
landowner thinking? He put all this effort into planting a vineyard, building a
winepress with a fence and a tower to protect it, and then he leaves. Not only
does he leave the vineyard, he places it into the hands of tenants who, when
the harvest time comes and the owner seeks the fruit, they kill the slaves he
sends to them. Finally, the landowner sends his son, thinking that something
different will happen; by this time, we aren’t surprised that the tenants have
killed him. What kind of landowner is this? What kind of tenants are these?
The landowner
seems like a fool. Why would he
expect different results from sending his son? It’s all well and good for us to
read the parable and say, “But of course, God is the landlord, and the son is
Jesus…” but then it becomes a little more complicated when we try to determine
who the tenants are. The scribes and Pharisees heard the parable as having been
said against them, but it seems that we ought not too easily be relieved. The
way blame seems to work in the parables is that it slips out from under our
reach, away from our control, bending and shifting when we’re not paying
attention.
Underlying the
tenants’ behavior is the belief that the landlord will never show up. Though
their behavior is appalling and foreign to our ears, they figured if they
killed enough slaves and then the heir, they would be left alone to tend the
vineyard, essentially owning the property because the landlord never bothered
to show up. I wonder if part of
why we are so quick to assign the “blame” in this parable is because we, like
the tenants, don’t really expect God (or, the landowner) to show up. So we go
about our business, in a world that bears the marks of the Creator, failing to
recognize what is right in front of us.
The tenants,
though clearly the antagonists of the story, were the ones who worked the land.
The landlord, who hadn’t been there in months, demanded the produce after they had worked so hard for it; they were entitled to it. It was theirs, right? The only problem was that
the vineyard wasn’t theirs. But it’s so easy to look at all the work that lays
piled ahead of us, all the work we’ve already done, all the nights of
too-little sleep and too-much worry, and to think that whatever successes we
have are ours, hard-fought and
long-won. We tend to look at God’s gifts and think of them as ours: our money, our time, our possessions, our earth, our decision.
Sometimes, we fail to recognize that we are the recipients of God’s gifts: of
time, of energy, of finances, of land, but more: God’s love and God’s grace.
The tenants saw
the land as theirs: “Let us kill the heir and we will have the inheritance.” The tenants, in some ways, get it
right: through Christ’s death, all that is Christ’s becomes ours and all that
is ours Christ takes to himself, binding himself to us and us to one another.
The crowds,
among whom were perhaps some tenants with absentee landlords, among whom were
perhaps some who were poor, whose daily lives were conditioned by struggle and
uncertainty, along with the spectrum of others – rich and poor, slave and free,
ones who were all too aware they were sinners and ones whose perceived
righteousness stood in the way of them reaching out to care for those among
them. When Jesus asks what the landlord will do, the crowd responds: “He will
put those wretches to a miserable death, and lease the vineyards to tenants who
will give him the produce at the harvest time.”
But is this what
happens? Jesus – the Son – comes into the world and is not recognized by that
world, is crucified by that world, and dies for that world. The cross turns the
expectations of the world upside down. It meets us in our guilt and in our
shame, in our failures to tend and to keep, in our failures to love our
neighbors, in our failures to share, in our belief that all we have is ours and that what others have or don’t
have isn’t our problem. Jesus didn’t come to hire new tenants; Jesus came to
make the tenants new.
The tenants
aren’t necessarily the scribes and the Pharisees; they aren’t those who fail to
recognize Jesus; they aren’t even those who hide behind church traditions as
they draw lines in the sand of who is in and who is out. The tenants are all of
us who have failed to regard all that we have as a gift. The tenants are all of
us who have clung to our possessions, time, or money as though it is our
security. The tenants are those who live in fear that, no matter what we do or
how hard we work, it will never be enough.
Jesus doesn’t
rise from the dead and put to death those who opposed him, as did the ancient
kings who eradicated the previous kings, their families and their religious
leadership. Jesus didn’t go to the cross in order to wreak vengeance on the
earth. Jesus’ cross was God’s NO to the tenants, the NO to forgetting that all
that we have is gift.
Jesus isn’t
God’s way of firing the tenants. Jesus is God’s way of stopping them in their
tracks, slowing them down long enough to recognize that God’s idea of justice
is far different from ours. Where we would put the tenants to a miserable death
and lease the land to new tenants, God would free the tenants from their
self-obsessed striving. What the tenants – and the people – didn’t expect is a
God who would send the Son out of love, out of hope, out of the desire to show
us a new way to live.
The cross turns
everything upside down. Where the tenants would be put to a miserable death, we
see Christ taking on all that they are to himself, giving them himself. Jesus,
embodying the kingdom of God, was taken away from the people. Jesus was the one
who took on the stone, being broken on behalf of the broken. Jesus turned the
world upside down, causing everything to happen contrary to our expectations.
In the cross, we receive the righteousness that is not – and could never be –
ours. Whatever we have, whatever we have garnered, whatever might gain us
honor, we regard as trash because of Christ. Under the shadow of the cross, we
unfaithful tenants are found in Christ,
contrary to all expectation. Whatever gains we might have had, whatever we
might call ours, is all loss, because
we have recognized that instead of being cast out of the vineyard, we have been
given a new lease: the vineyard is a gift, it is the place of the Beloved, it
is the place not of death and destruction, but of love and grace.
Let me sing a
song of my Beloved, whose faithfulness has covered my unfaithfulness, whose
righteousness has covered my unrighteousness, whose gift has covered my guilt.
Let me sing a song in which the world is turned upside down to reveal the
nature of the Giver in the Gift. Let me sing a song of the world as gift, a
reminder that the Lover of Creation is its Creator and its Giver.
No comments:
Post a Comment